>At the risk of being redundant, the more I think about it, the more disgusting this man becomes.
>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/04/us/politics/trump-hurricane-alabama-sharpie.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
>
>For a while, these antics seemed seem OK because of how useless most "news" had become.
>
>I came across this last week and it cleared up a lot of things for me:
>"The basic lessons that Trump learned from (Roy) Cohn were: Never apologize. If someone hits you, hit them back a thousand times harder. Any publicity is good publicity. And find an ‘other.’"
>
>The source is not relevant. It just fits.

The source *is* relevant and in this case it was NY TIMES … again … a well-known anti-Trump paper.

As John says, several possible paths were laid out for the hurricane and the NYT simply framed the news to make Trump look stupid by omitting the full spectrum of possible paths. But more than this - this type of criticism is laughably stupid because does the NYT or its readers think that Trump himself is analysing the meteorological data and coming up with his own weather forecasts and thus responsible for their veracity!? Ridiculous. His advisors will have come up with these forecasts and he would be only the mouthpiece for them. .