>>>>I agree, 100%. I can see a lot of potential. The only problem is that now I want to refactor hundreds of the routines where this approach can be applied :) I have to resist the temptation :)
>>>
>>>Btw, it also good for passing parameters when you have too many of them
>>
>>I agree. In fact this particular method receives 9 parameters. And I may just replace them with one object with 9 properties. Thank you.
>
>An extra bonus by using an object as parameter is that your "parameters" will have names, so you don't have to remember their order.

Good point