>>You've frequently cited Trump's record on job creation.

Actually I've frequently quoted "best jobless figures in history" and pondered how that might be interpreted by the beneficiaries. They don't have the luxury of converting everything into 'cars go slower or faster so hey presto". And the tactic of converting personal despair into misapplied math is how antisocial 1%ers justify offshoring millions of jobs at the expense of millions of US families and kids, to gain some more fat for themselves. Just saying.

>>When Obama (remember him?) took office in 2009, the unemployment rate was 9.9.
>>When Trump relieved him, the rate was 4.1.
>>Now, two years after Trump took office, it's 3.9.

Condescension might elicit guffaws in some quarters but is not a proof. Why yes I do remember Obama and I remember his "magic wand" fatalism wrt further improvements in employment. Then came bad orange man who did everything wrong according to the experts- tariffs will smash US business and send unemployment sky-high! The policies are racist and will kill inner city communities which is what Trump wants! Tax reductions will only benefit the rich! Stopping import of sweatshop labour instead of employing citizens, will end the Republic! - and yet, just as the electorate failed to follow the certain narrative presented to it in 2016, the universe fails to follow the certainty that everything that disgusting man does will turn to dust. As I keep saying: if you're one of those consigned to the dustheap unless a magic wand can be found, perhaps you should wonder who are the real racists here- the ones spending all their energy accusing and hating, or the ones whose actions turn out to help you.

As for relative employment figures: please. If people want to pose absurd similies, here's another: picture a badly polluted river. The first 50% improvement is easy enough. But the closer you get to purity, the harder each percentage point gets. Same with employment: you can never reach full employment but a 50-year record is astounding despite the fakery of linear versus logarithmic performance.

>>So we can trust neither the fake news, elites, the swamp, the murders and rapists trying to invade us, Pocahontas, Sleepy Joe, Lying Ted, Little Marco, nor the "deep state."

Trust is earned and in 2019, it's safest to review from source- and it's the action of a liar to try to conceal source and allow only their own version. But as Adam Schiff is learning, resorting to straw man and hyperbole only works so long. Apart from that, this sort of comment is beneath you and ineffective in present company surely.