>>>>>I agree in general.
>>>>>The deception is even more egregious when you consider the number of people who go deeply into debt to go to college and never finish (about 40%)
>>>>
>>>>There's also the forgotten factor of unemployment time between graduation and that salary. The salary which gets into the average is only the paid one; the missed ones are absent from the calculation.
>>>>
>>>>>As I said before, though, the quality of the individual is more important than the degree or lack of it.
>>>>
>>>>And the same should apply to HR managers, i.e. they should be looking at the candidates through such glasses. But no - there are many of those who only try to reduce the time spent on reading CVs, to the point that they read only the first paragraph or even filter out, without reading, those not containing a certain set of TLAs.
>>>
>>>Posted yesterday on BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50761116
>>Lack of reliability is the reason lie detector test, which are able to measure "involuntary" reactions, are not used in courts. I would like to see how well this works on very experienced actors/actresses or some members of Bernie Madof's profession or maybe in a game of Texas Hold'em against the top ten players in The World Series of Poker.
>
>Against poker pros, not even required: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190711141343.htm
>
>Dunno if emotion recognition would help.
Very interesting. I don't think that the emotional recognition had much to do with the outcomes but was more of the use of the players betting patterns and the use of probabilities.