>>I'm sure that the judge will take all that into consideration when passing sentence on him.
Which is the style of response no matter how well the country does or whatever actual evidence is produced, correct?
Don't forget he's been targeted by the full power of the state since before 2016...
/edit - examples removed, you either accept or you don't and I suspect you don't/
... and *still* they couldn't get'im... yet still some behave as if some judge is about to jail him, yay. Never mind that judicial officers can't indict let alone try a sitting POTUS which power appears to be vested solely in Congress... all arguments are trumped by this impending judicial jailing.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
