>>and there we have it -- clearly you did not read all of that (if any) yet -- so no point in talking further in this "anti-intellectual ad hominem conversation"
>>Sorry your magical December paper does not overwrite history and facts.
By this logic, HRC won the election because you've got an NYT article that promised she would, and subsequent events do not overwrite history and facts.
I understand why your fake news sources are reluctant to acknowledge the December paper which is far from perfect but blows huge holes in the fearmongering rhetoric.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
