>>>and there we have it -- clearly you did not read all of that (if any) yet -- so no point in talking further in this "anti-intellectual ad hominem conversation"
>>>Sorry your magical December paper does not overwrite history and facts.
>
>By this logic, HRC won the election because you've got an NYT article that promised she would, and subsequent events do not overwrite history and facts.
>
>I understand why your fake news sources are reluctant to acknowledge the December paper which is far from perfect but blows huge holes in the fearmongering rhetoric.

So you think that after 70+ times of trying to get rid of ObamaCare that the GOP has suddenly had some sort of epiphany and did an uturn? I do not think you are foolish enough to buy into that & you just wan to argue for the sake of starting an argument. It is either that or you are just misinformed.