>>>I've been working with a dual monitor setup since the late 90's, I switched to a 3 monitor setup about a few years ago.
>>>
>>>Currently even the 3 Full HD monitor cannot still my hunger to more real estate and am considering a 6 full HD monitor setup.
>>>
>>>So far I found the following hardware to do this.
>>>- Sapphire GPRO 6200 video card with 6 mini DP
>>>- 6 x Dell P2219H - 21.5" monitor
>>>- a FPMA-D700D6 NewStar flat screen desk mount
>>>
>>>I would cost me about 1.500 euros. Any better suggestions. Any reasons not to do this?
>
>Thanks All,
>
>>Have you tried multiple/virtual desktops in Win10? 2 minute video overview at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HJbPDxzDqU
>
>Yep, I tried. The big bummer for me is that you can't save and restore that when you restart your computer. But really I'd like to have all screens visible at once.
>
>>Ultrawide (sometimes curved) monitors can reduce bezel issues and be a bit more ergonomic (at higher unit cost) e.g. 3840x1080, 3840x1440
>
>The 4k Monitors could be an alternative, if I can get large ones. 32" is just too small. Also I need some kind of tool that let the 4 HD real estate to behave as 4 monitors in terms of moving, snapping and maximizing windows. I'm not aware of such tools though.
>
>To be honest I do not mind the bezel issue that much as I'm going to use them as 6 monitors and not trying to create a wall of one desktop. The dell P2219H has a thin bezel and for the top row I can mount the monitors upsize down.
>
>The bigger issue is the massive cabling though.
>
>>DP can support daisy-chaining monitors (which support that feature), it can make cabling easier and give you more choice of video cards i.e. you might need only 2 or 3 DP outputs instead of 6.
>
>Unfortunately I could not find any 21-22" monitor with DP-MST and a thin bezel. I know Dell have a few, but nothing in the 21-22" range.
>
>>My eyes aren't getting any younger, I find 23" my minimum for a full HD display, and 24" is more comfortable. Might be a consideration if you plan on keeping them for a while.
>
>In my late 40-ties, I certainly have some trouble reading the newspaper and also need glasses when driving, but my eyes are sharp as a razor when watching a monitor from a normal distance. The reason for a 21"-22" monitor over a 23-24 one is simply about the viewing angle, which I found an issue before.
>
>>A good rule of thumb for ergonomics is the distance between your face and the screen(s) should be 1.5x the diagonal measurement of the screen(s).

You might want to be careful with that display adapter. It looks like an unusual commercial product for digital signage and display wall. There might be unusual limitations on its display modes. I couldn't find a listing on Amazon. I did find this: https://www.amazon.com/VisionTek-Radeon-7750-GDDR5-MiniDP/dp/B00C7EPSVS/ref=sr_1_1 (7750 was released February 2012).

Another possibility would be 2 adapters, each with 3 DP outputs. One interesting option would be 2x Quadro P400 https://www.amazon.com/PNY-NVIDIA-Quadro-Professional-Graphics/dp/B06X9PW5DZ/ref=sr_1_1 . Apparently Quadro cards support nView, which is an advanced window manager which can store configuration profiles: https://www.pny.com/nvidia-quadro-p400 (shows advanced software support). There are videos about nView on YouTube.

That Quadro is based on a few-years-old nVidia chipset (GP107 c.2017, 14nm technology), which probably explains the low price - normally when I hear "Quadro" I hear cash registers ringing. That chip is also used in the GTX 1050/1050Ti. The Sapphire claims it's based on AMD "GCN" (28nm) but doesn't specify the generation, it's not new either. Ongoing software/driver support for the Quadro should be good, I'm not so sure about the AMD.

So-called "MST hubs" are available as well.

There are Windows desktop managers available as well e.g. https://windowsreport.com/best-virtual-desktop-software/ (I haven't tried any of them). I imagine they can store profiles and let you swap rapidly between them.

7HJbPDxzDqU