>Carter: Probably worse than Obama, but guessing one of Carters peanuts would have won against Ford
>Reagan 1st stint: great (estimate probably enhanced via comparison to Carter)
>Reagan 2nd stint: Alzheimer creeping up
>
>Bush the elder: quite ok, undervalued from my POV
Agreed.

>>Clinton - Degenerate
>Not really in my POV - US standards, esp. religous and political/personal are skewed in my book.

His pardons were terrible.

How bad can it be?
During the mid sixties, when mainframe computers were first making inroads into US businesses, when evaluating a new application, we’d frequently ask:
“How bad can it be?”
and if we couldn’t conjure up a disaster we’d give it a shot.
We were rarely wrong, but when we were we found out how bad it could be and it was often very bad.
As new and better methods of evaluating and managing projects have come along that question has largely been discarded.

I, for one, resurrected that question when looking at Trump vs HRC and-
I found out.