>The same is true in the US: under Democratic control, more money goes directly to those who need money (and therefore spend it right away) and to projects (like roads, bridges, etc.) that hire people. Those efforts result in less Federal debt after 4 or 8 years and a healthier economy. Under Republicans, the money goes to corporations, where a good chunk of it is never seen again. Money doesn't come from a "pot" -- it moves around the economy, either quickly or slowly. When it moves quickly, everyone benefits. This isn't just Keynesian theory -- it's been proven over and over again across the shifts in political power in the US.

So Dem.=Good, Rep.=Bad. Got it.

And I agree, "money doesn't come from a pot". But saying "it moves around the economy" doesn't explain where it does come from, Which is ... ?