>>>Update:
>>>Now I remember that VFP6 has no empty object - so vfp6 users would have to change "empty" for "line" .
>>
>>Marco, I think that VFP6 support would require a different approach. There would certainly be conflicts with Line existing properties and the properties of Win32_ classes, starting with Name.
>
>Hi Antonio..
>Just tested.. It works with a simple workaround:
>

That's neat, Marco! VFP6 developers should only be aware of the possibility (as far as I can tell, I think it's just the Name property that will have problems with, err, the name).

Well done!