>>Can I assume by "attempted rapist" you are referring to Kavanaugh, or someone else?
>
>Yes, Kavanaugh. Horrifying that two of nine on the Supreme Court have reasonably well-document histories of sexual misconduct.

OK, you've written that Kavanaugh was an attempted rapist and that there's reasonably well-documented histories.

Prove it. In a paragraph or two, what's the compelling evidence against him.