Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Mdot question
Message
De
06/04/2021 01:39:02
Walter Meester
HoogkarspelPays-Bas
 
 
À
05/04/2021 18:43:57
Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
01679493
Message ID:
01679559
Vues:
40
>>SNIP
>>
>>>Why do that when it is not necessary, but ignore mdot when it certainly can be necessary?
>>
>>If you find yourself that it is necessary, it already is an indication there is something wrong. Column names should not conflict variable names in the first place. Granted, there are situations where this is out of your control, but in general your naming conventions should avoid this at all cost.
>>
>>To answer your question directly. For me it affects readability. As like Lutz, I hate it passionately.
>
>I don't care what you personally think or do. FoxPro works that way.

That is a nonsensical answer. Coding practices have very little to do with how a product was designed. The latter is a human readable representation of instructions to the mechanics in the programming language.

The fox isn't flawless. With the knowledge we have now it would not have been build in the same way as it is. There is a reason there is a good portion of commands and functions that are not commonly used anymore. The mdot would certainly not be part of VFP if it would not rely on its heritage.

So I have no idea, what your implying when you say "FoxPro works that way".
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform