>>>>>I'm sorry, but you're mistaken. Some people go out of their way to argue non-scientifically just because they can't stand to be wrong.
>>>
>>>Not many people like to be wrong, or to be told they're wrong when their experience and context may not match yours.
>>
>>mdot is science, not mdot is subjective and cosmetics. Ludicrous to have anyone argue for that.
>
>Sorry, I just cannot resist:
>
>You don't have to tell us that you have no grasp on what science is, its evident from all the delusional claims you make.

Art is where the painter can use vomit or feces to make 'art'. That is not art. Scientific thinking is what is required here. Your arguments against mdot are subjective. You just don't like it. Even though it is built into FoxPro you hate it. That is irrational and stupid.

I worked with some of the best real medical scientists. You cannot deny that in the case where a scatter memvar is used on a table, that there exist memvars matching the field names and the only way to distinguish between them is mdot. Fact, not subjective opinion which is why fools are so prevalent. Because you think a speed increase doesn't exist or matter, does not change the fact that it is there. You are irrelevant.

"Scientific objectivity is a property of various aspects of science. It expresses the idea that scientific claims, methods, results—and scientists themselves—are not, or should not be, influenced by particular perspectives, value judgments, community bias or personal interests, to name a few relevant factors."

>
>BTW, Programming is more of an art than science in the first place.
>https://www.parkersoftware.com/blog/is-programming-art/