>>>I was nearly murdered by school yard scum like Walter. So, who knows more about bullying, me or you?
>>
>>First, I got death threats here on the UT in late July 2005 from William Sanders (who later admitted he was drunk)
>>
>>Mike, I've read nearly all the exchanges between the two of you. Definitely some name calling (which, IMO, you escalated), definitely hostility - but considering you are equating that with "almost murdered", you couldn't possibly be less credible in your endeavors to be talking about "science".
>>
>>You have lost all perspective. At least Mike Beane (god rest his soul) could attribute his rantings and behavior to alcoholism. What's your excuse?
>
>If you believe washout walters OPINION equals my SCIENCE it is you that are missing all perspective.

Again mike, you have no idea what science is or means. I've never made a claim my opinions are science, YOU ARE MAKING THAT CLAIM. You've failed to demonstrate to know what science really means.

It surely does not mean:
1. If a language supports a feature, you should use that feature.
2. That a feature can be used to solve a particular problem, it is the only way to solve the problem or even the best way to solve the problem

You have been arguing both.