>>>>>I was nearly murdered by school yard scum like Walter. So, who knows more about bullying, me or you?
>>>>
>>>>First, I got death threats here on the UT in late July 2005 from William Sanders (who later admitted he was drunk)
>>>>
>>>>Mike, I've read nearly all the exchanges between the two of you. Definitely some name calling (which, IMO, you escalated), definitely hostility - but considering you are equating that with "almost murdered", you couldn't possibly be less credible in your endeavors to be talking about "science".
>>>>
>>>>You have lost all perspective. At least Mike Beane (god rest his soul) could attribute his rantings and behavior to alcoholism. What's your excuse?
>>>
>>>If you believe washout walters OPINION equals my SCIENCE it is you that are missing all perspective.
>>
>>Again mike, you have no idea what science is or means. I've never made a claim my opinions are science, YOU ARE MAKING THAT CLAIM. You've failed to demonstrate to know what science really means.
>>
>>It surely does not mean:
>>1. If a language supports a feature, you should use that feature.
>>2. That a feature can be used to solve a particular problem, it is the only way to solve the problem or even the best way to solve the problem
>>
>>You have been arguing both.
>
>Ach Walter hou er mee op.

Ik weet het, maar hij maakt het me wel moeilijk om zijn waanzin te negeren.
Hij kan het niet laten om mij af te zeiken in elk bericht dat hij post.

Ik ga nog een poging wagen om hem te negeren.