>>>>It is not a great stretch to realize not to hard-code names into an app, but when people think programming is art instead of engineering, they will not engineer a simple thing like this instead of a primitive hard-coding of names.
>>>
>>>What happened to the science? So now you say that programming is engineering? What is it mike?
>>>
>>>I'm sure in your blind rage you did not deepen yourself into the matter, so here a few links for you
>>>
>>>https://www.parkersoftware.com/blog/is-programming-art/
>>>https://towardsdatascience.com/programming-is-art-2d2c66fb0f96
>>>https://ruben.verborgh.org/blog/2013/02/21/programming-is-an-art/
>>>https://spin.atomicobject.com/2012/06/12/computer-programming-is-still-an-art/
>>>
>>>If you think this a relatively new viewing angle on the subject.. nope as the following article goes back to 1974
>>>http://paulgraham.com/knuth.html
>>
>>
>>All you say is bullshit. Your hero says it must be elevated to a science.
>
>No he doesn't. He speaks off elevating the art by accepting scientific principles, not turning it into science.
>You did not read the link. especially the part why he says his book is called "The Art of Computer Programming"
>
>So tell me why he called it that way ???
>
>Stop the BS mike.

You are the one whose clients laughed at your "demo". I am the one the Drew Speedie hired personally. You are a pathetic jealous loser. Even Jim Nelson said you were a Nazi about formatting and that I was far most skilled than you back then. Why else do you think he asked me to meet with both of you.

I have read that article for years. Lots of people disagree with your brainless rants about your personal preference to not use mdot, including Tamar Granor who you are unfit to breath the same air as.

Go sulk in your corner loser.