Hi Jim,
Probably an ignorant question here but what's semaphore implementation?
Thanks.
Denise
>Hi Jim,
>
>Here I would agree wholeheartedly! But it *does* entail more than just setting Optimistic buffering to be active, and I think that is an important point for readers.
>
>Since the docs are not that clear (from what I can find, anyways) on "own" locking with buffering enabled, I suppose that some semaphore implementation would be safest.
~~~~~~~~~~
Denise
~~~~~~~~~~