>>I guess that many type of jobs will disappear before ours because of all the directions we need to take creating our wonderfull apps :-)
>>
>>For example. Let's say there is a person in an enterprise that was hired by the president for her writing skills. That person created nice emails that the president has to send.
>>
>>The day the president hears about Chat GPT, The job of the person that write those emails is at risk.
>>
>Maybe Maybe not.
>
>Vanderbilt apologizes for use of ChatGPT for email on MSU ...

As for the app which predicts the next word, I wrote that a dozen years ago. Here's what it does on a dataset containing american legal texts - them case studies that JVPs of this world had to study.

„(f) Any witness who is called to the pumps to attend to the business conducted in the best interests of the public. Historically, public nuisance was criminal in the sense of an evil-minded act or an unlawful act; (a) or an act dangerous to life and health. P then petitioned the Surrogate Court for judicial settlement of the entire gross estate reduced by the amount of such reduction. “

„(4) furnish to the indenture security holders according to the usage of the trade secret will lie. P's non-solicitation clause is overbroad and casts its net over a broad range of interests protected by procedural due process because the order for relief in the party's pleadings. “

„Stat. 577;" before "45 U. S. C. 802(6)), other than the lessee is entitled to have established Article III standing, " Raines v. Byrd, 521 U. S. at p. 266 [“we have not hesitated to strike down a taking that, by a clear and present danger of serious bodily harm to others have the malice for a person to apprise himself of the marketing order is focused upon sound considerations of public policy (and deep pockets), D would be required to reimburse his tenant for the cost of remedying defects to a contract for clothing. “