Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Comparison
Message
General information
Forum:
Python
Category:
Other
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01686457
Message ID:
01686520
Views:
53
Hi John,

Lianja does that UI/data integration for web apps.

Using WebAssembly (a matter of filling in 6 or so fields and pressing a button) the web app can be a desktop app -- hitting a cloud server that can be local or remote.

There are many options (and thus a lot to explore, learn, use) and that's the point: you have the options available.

Your backend data operations can be in any of the supported languages: VFP/LianjaScript, Python, Javascript, PHP.

Hank

>>It's exactly the wizzy wig designers that need to be redesigned to keep up the changes in python and wx (and >wxPython). I once managed to use one of them and concluded that I don't need them. That was three years ago. >I don't need that kind of thing with the proportional method of assigning space to controls, that wx uses. It >doesn't care about any damn pixels, it just calculates the proportion of space to give them, and you can just set >the proportion at will for any group of controls at some level (and yup, it's nested, it's all containers in >containers, under different names). Never looked back.
>
>>Actually I was disappointed (weird, I wasn't appointed first) when I saw that everybody went the M$ way and >denounced foxels in favor of pixels. And since then we had to invent various resizing acrobatics and whatnot. >Had there been the decision to go with foxels and generally the vector graphics way, we could have saved >ourselves months of work over the years. But no, M$ loves pixels, so redo all the graphic stuff every few years, >because monitors have grown.
>
>I haven't found any GUI framework or library today that doesn't have some form of sizers/flexbox/grid system to position controls. I really like the CSS stuff but haven't found anything that really works well or better than just hand coding the properties I want. When I say better I mean easier and able to handle what I want.
>The biggest thing with Dabo is how it handles data. Like Fox it does a great job. Not having to code the association between a control and data is very big for me. Dabo just handles all of it. Most (if not all) of the web stuff does not attempt to deal with data for Crud apps. In fact, most of the new stuff like Flutter, Flet are just single page apps. They don't allow for multi-pages being open at the same time or opening the same page multiple times - like we can do with desktop apps. Of course they work because often we only want straight line websites (go forward or backward is allowed). When someone comes up with a web development tool that matches fox or Dabo I'll be first in line - for sure.
>Johnf
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform