>>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Does somebody know what changes the sorting order of debuggers LOCALS window? I have two IDE's running on different FoxUsers showing different order, but no idea what and where changes this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I've never seen any way to control that at all. I wonder if the difference you're seeing has to do with when you open the debugger.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tamar
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The programs are identical so far, the raise the debugger with SET STEP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>See picture. The fancy part is, it will happen even if I use the same foxuser (iow a copy)
>>>>>
>>>>>Right-click in each and see whether you have different settings for what should be displayed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tamar
>>>>
>>>>I tried this before posting. The settings are the same, and there is nothing like sorting. I tried Watch too.
>>>
>>>And they're both scrolled all the way to the top?
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>
>>I attached a new pic - same prg, from different foxusers. A clear all was issued before the start, so the public on top is removed. The window is on top, see the scroll bars.
>>You see the I, laDirs and lcValue, you see the declaration of laDirs, the I is declared just right of it . On the right panel, the laDirs is listed just below.
>>The t* stuff are the parameters. This is foxbin2prg, evaluateConfiguration method.
>
> Hi Lutz,
>
> Order in Local windows it's equal to variable's creating order.
>
>MartinaJ
Hi Martina,
Thanks
The problem is, this is the same program, started the same way after a CLEAR ALL, some folder, same paras. The order per IDE is always the same.
But possibly it's not so much the order of creation, but something with VFP internal table of variables - at least the stuff the IDE start initially is different, so memory allocation is different.
What I crap. I try to compare two slightly different parameters, but is it a pain to compare the locals window.
Words are given to man to enable him to conceal his true feelings.
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord
Weeks of programming can save you hours of planning.
OffThere is no place like [::1]