>Thanks again; that was informative. Protecting the EXE is exactly what (and
>all) I'm interested in. Any reason I'd need ReFox or other if this option in
>VFP provides encryption?

I think ReFox can decrypt an encrypted EXE, actually... I'm not sure, though.

>Also, how does this removal of deleted rows being built into my EXE help me? I
>can understand that might make for a cleaner EXE, but what does that mean as
>far as protection goes?

Nothing, but you also asked about EXE size.

>Do you use an encrypting product on top of VFP?

No, but that doesn't mean I never will...