>>If I had to sum it up, it's all based on the fact that computers are based on the recursive definition of the state of a bit. It's either opened or closed. No middle ground. That's the way I work.
>Uh oh. Now you've introduced a new thread! Fuzzy Logic! < bg >

ROFL

>>Everything is so tightly defined that you might think that I'm anal retentive (I'm anything but).:-)
>See? You prove my point! < bseg >

Or have I proven mine? I'm referring to the one on the top of my head. < rbg >