>Hi George,
>
>>Now when you pass a 0 when passing by reference, you're actually passing a null pointer.
>
>You could achieve the same in a more readable way when you pass NULL instead of 0. It would match what you see in the SDK...
>
Hi Christof,

Thanks for the tip. You're absolutely right about it being more readable (not to mention more consistent with the SDK).

Let's see, I'm gonna chalk this one up to still having to work in FPW 2.6. Yeah, that's the ticket (said with every possible crossable part of the body being crossed).:-)