>Hi James,
>
>>where you could write working applications in less than 64k).
>
>That would be a huge application. Many jobs could be done in even less. *s*
>
Yes they could, but I was thinking of the "really huge, gigantic" apps, like full-featured spreadsheets and word processors -- you know, the really big stuff.
regards,
Jim Edgar
Jurix Data Corporation
jmedgar@yahoo.comNo trees were destroyed in sending this message. However, a large number of electrons were diverted from their ordinary activities and terribly inconvenienced.
