Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
BINTOC() and CDX size
Message
From
07/01/1999 12:59:19
 
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00173567
Message ID:
00173652
Views:
26
Christof,

>Yes, but I doubt that it makes sense in an application, because using native integers is faster than using strings.
Yes.

This far, I was never forced into weighing between Int and BINTOC() for smaller CDXs. However, BINTOC() was an inprovement and necessity when combined with other string-fields in the table. Anyway, this is out of the main topic.

Thanks!


>Hi Kenneth,
>
>>Perhaps if you know you aren't in for big integers, you can consider BINTOC(...,2)
>
>Yes, but I doubt that it makes sense in an application, because using native integers is faster than using strings.
>
>Christof
Kenneth.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform