I see.

I do agree that user-specifiable would be best.

Cheers,

Jim N

>Hi Jim,
>
>>Just wondering why you wrote "unfortunately" in your reply. I would have thought that it was FORTUNATE thst VFP behaved this way.
>
>Because I discovered this behavior when I tried to pass back and forth a temporary table in a temporary DBC between objects in different datasessions. Having a transaction in one datasession permitted in this case to open the table in another datasession.
>
>OK, in general it's great, but I'd rather have the possibility to define which databases are involved in a transaction.
>
>Christof