David,

The point is to DISCUSS any item. Some might be killed off as easy workaround or some such. Others might get greatly amplified.
The idea would be to get to some content, for any item, which can then be passed on to MS. No problem with them reading elsewise.

Thing is, we get *NO* responses with current method, so the search is on for a method which, showing some siginificant investment on one side, encourages the other side (MS) to respond.

Jim N

>Jim, Jim, et.al.
>
>It's common in other places to just post a thread with ER (Enhancement Request) at the start of the title. I think that would work just as well here. It's pretty obvious that Microsoft reads through the messages here so that would help them spot the messages. The threads can also be but in the relevant categories, which may help people interested in an area join the discussion.
>
>>The man be busy! Also this is not a decision I would expect him to make without consulting with numerous VFP VIPs both within and outside M$.
>>
>>Patience rules.