>>>>>>That must be nice. :) Unfortunately, only one of my users has an internet connection, so I can't go through that way. Luckily I don't have to do much online support anymore. My coworker is the one doing most version 5 support, and we haven't released 6 yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-Michelle
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There are some other issues. With anothe 56K modem, the fastest I have connected at was around 52 - and the performance was fine.... Usually, I use IP addresss and connect through a T1 - which is real nice .. < bg > :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The clients only have 33.6. Never connected at 33.6, though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Won't they upgrade??? I think we are talking roughly $100.00/$150.00 here...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>< JVP >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't know. I never asked. I'm pretty sure on of the clients has 56k, and I don't connect any faster there, so I didn't think it would make a difference.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-Michelle
>>>>>
>>>>>I've used pcANYWHERE and conected with clients at 28.8K, and don't see any really bad performance. The only odd thing is that menu pull-downs seem to refresh horizontally (drawing one pixel column at a time) very slowly instead of vertically (top down) like everything else seems to do, which is pretty acceptable as far as speed goes. Faster is definitely better, though.
>>>>
>>>>I wonder why I'm having so much trouble. It seems to take forever to do anything.
>>>>
>>>>-Michelle
>>>
>>>Which version of pcANYWHERE are you using? 7.5, well, wasn't so hot, but 8.0's been great!
>>
>>
>>I'm using 8.
>>
>>-Michelle
>
>Well, pcANYWHERE has certainly never been as slow to use as UT sometimes is, but it's OK for me. I think I figured out why the menu's refresh horizontally. On W98, thats the way they are drawn, from left to right.

It's much slower that the UT. I'd rather use the web than pcA.

-Michelle