>>Unless you have a usefull answer, you should not take up an entry on the UT with meaningless replies.
>
>I found Craigs answer meaningful. He made an honest attempt to help you out, and you were pretty rude with your response. If you're worried about taking up entries on the UT with meaningless replies, then why did you reply? Yours is the most meaningless reply I've seen to date. I hope no one will hesitate to answer my questions for fear that I will respond the way you did to Craig. Good luck with determining your KLOC.
Marcus,
I presume you have not examined the entire thread or you would have notices that Kevin apologized for his remarks yesterday. Since he has apologized, there is no point, IMHO, in making a further issue of it.
regards,
Jim Edgar
Jurix Data Corporation
jmedgar@yahoo.comNo trees were destroyed in sending this message. However, a large number of electrons were diverted from their ordinary activities and terribly inconvenienced.