>Fred,
>
>Yes, each object in memory has it's own space for it's current property values. I was pointing out in the first message that each class definition has it's version of each property in memory too.

That's the way I read it from your message. Dragan seemed to be of a differing opinion, though.

>
>>Wouldn't ALL object have to have the space allocated for the properties, since they could change the value after it's instanciated? The non-default properties would only be initialized with the inherited value, but they would still be separate from the base class properties. Changing any one of the objects other properties would effect only that object, so they must have separate space allocated for each object's properties.