Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Development on a special drive letter
Message
 
À
25/01/1999 13:06:24
Dragan Nedeljkovich (En ligne)
Now officially retired
Zrenjanin, Serbia
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
FoxPro 2.x
Divers
Thread ID:
00178297
Message ID:
00179908
Vues:
31
>>>On the matter of FoxTools, it's just a pity that it wasn't completely included into Fox as early as 2.0, when it first appeared (or was it 2.5?). I've seen the same functions rewritten hundred times in Fox, often repeated at various places in code. I remember I once took three days to weed out all the string-by-words and filename manipulation out of my FPD framework, and replaced them with FPath (aka FoxTools) functions. Never regretted the effort, and the code is far easier to read. Besides, it's faster.
>>
>>Unfortunately, I never knew about the functions in FPath. It was while I was playing around trying to figure out how FPW created a directory that I found Foxtools. Not finding a foxtools.plb, I wrote equivalents of the functions I was using in FPW in FPD (including a MsgBox()).
>
>Fpath.plb (FPD 2.5 and 2.6) contained, roughly, the same functions as FoxTools.fll did in FPW. Probably just some windows-specific things were missing.

Hi Dragan,

Interestingly enough, as I recall, Fpath included some bitwise operator functions, that, for some reason were excluded from foxtools. It wasn't until VFP that we got them back.
George

Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform