George,

I didn't even know there was an double ==. I just copied this from the message of Bob Archer. You're indeed correct if you say that the double equal sign is not needed in this case, but sometimes i find it correct to use the double '=' by means of readability. for eg:

lRetvalue= nValue1 == nValue2

instead off

lRetValue= nValue1= nValue2

Because in C and C++ this would be evaluated total differently

Regards, Walter