>>ATX form factor boards, which won't fit right in older AT form factor cases), so a motherboard upgrade is going to force them to either change cases, or go with a 'Super7' motherboard and a non-Intel processor, again, not inherently a bad thing, but a consideration.
>>
>>And the 64MB minimum is coming from the same people who told you that Win95 would run on a 386SX with 4MB of RAM...
>
>I tried that. It ran. No. It crawled.
>
>When I won a game of Solitaire, the cars bounced long enough to allow me a break, so I could go to a toilet, get back, go to kitchen, take something from the fridge, and when I got back it was just about ready to drop the aces.

I remember. And having tried a few other 'minimum' system configurations in the past (like trying to run NT on a machine with 12MB of RAM), I'm guessing that 128MB will be needed in the not too distant future...

This is scary; I remember thinking that a PDP 8e with 16K of 12-bit core and a TU-8 tape drive was 'big iron'!