Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Dynazip, reasons to use or not use?
Message
From
31/01/1999 07:33:49
 
 
To
31/01/1999 07:22:04
Mark Hall
Independent Developer & Voip Specialist
Keston, Kent, United Kingdom
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Third party products
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00132555
Message ID:
00182250
Views:
12
>>Four of these need to be registered. Is all that just for development purposes or is it necessary when I send it out? Anyone had problems distributing to clients? Thanks for your input.
>>
>>>>Marcus.
>>>Your users will need those OCXs registered. The setup wizard can handle that. Many of those .DLLs are basic Windows files which people will probably have. I don't know if it's safe to assume so. If you do distribute them, the setup program should probably be checking the filedates and overwriting only if yours are newer. I don't know if the Setup Wizard can handle that. We use DynaZip in-house, so we don't need to worry about all these things. I'd also be interested in knowing the right way to do this, in case we ever distribute our app more widely.
>>
>>The files needed for distribution of zip and unzip activex controls are clearly spelled out in a file called dzactivex.txt (when you received the activex controls). No, you don't have to send all of those files. I have the activeX.txt file I can send you that spells it out if you can't find it.
>>I am using InstallShield Express instead of vfp's install wizard. I marked the files so they would self-register themselves.
>>Robert
>
>It is possible to use just the .DLL thru VFP. Then all you need to do is distribute the .DLL with your app.
>
>The VB example that ship with dynazip are quite easily translated to VFP, except that you do need to pass a structure as a parameter to the .DLL, which means some messing about with strings. But as it negates the need to register OCXs etc, I would use the .DLL

I don't know DynaZip, but from a portability perspective, I'd rather use ActiveX/OLE than an API call for any of a number of reasons - readability of code are just a couple of reasons. Registration of a control just isn't that difficult (either using REGSVR32, or the API registration functions (there are samples of using the API-based self-registration calls in the FAQ here) and if lots of structures with embedded pointers, or arrays, are used by the .DLL calls, the VFP code will be a lot cleaner with OLE Automation.
EMail: EdR@edrauh.com
"See, the sun is going down..."
"No, the horizon is moving up!"
- Firesign Theater


NT and Win2K FAQ .. cWashington WSH/ADSI/WMI site
MS WSH site ........... WSH FAQ Site
Wrox Press .............. Win32 Scripting Journal
eSolutions Services, LLC

The Surgeon General has determined that prolonged exposure to the Windows Script Host may be addictive to laboratory mice and codemonkeys
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform