Luis,
I could be wrong, but I don't see how you can hope to have the record pointer *not* move during a table update. Before you issue your table update, you could store the record number of the record pointer and then reset the pointer when you're done.

>Hello everybody,
>When you are using table buffering, that is, buffering=5 or
>buffering =3, after updating several records and doing a
>TableUpdate(.t.), the cursor is moved to the last record
>mdified, I want the cursor to stay where it is without hav
>having to doit manually.