> BTW, I am not overly upset at MM I am upset at the lack of backward capabiltiy in 4.0. It would have been much better to flag the non-compatible code or some other thing than force companies to buy a (to me) marginal upgrade in functionality from M$.

Jon,

Glad to hear you got it working.

As for MM 4.0, I remember talking to Oakleaf prior to it's release and when asked my opinion I didn't think the backward compatability would be a big problem. Since alot of the enhancements they are adding utilize VFP 6 features, most of them would not be functional with VFP 5 and earlier anyway. So you would basically have MM 3.02, but MM 4.0 would have all this extra version code to deal with. The framework is very complex already, I think for the most part this would just add complexity without much benefit.

Kind Regards,

Mat