Well, I really don't know. I never redirect a return like that. But I'd suspect that it really means PROC, not method. Where are you redirecting from? Is this in an error handler, by any chance? If not, then why not just call the method?

Maybe if you tell us a bit more about the specifics you'll get some good suggestions on alternatives if RETURN TO isn't going to work. Honestly, it sounds like maybe the design could use a little adjusting.

>But I thought for ProcName I could use a method's name?