>
>I suspected as much and that is a drag. I was hoping that I was wrong.
>
>>Furthermore the app runs in Temporary Files, and can be wiped out by the IE
>>cache mechanism, so storing persistent data there is not a good idea.
>>
>
>I also saw a hint of that in my tests. But I thought that I was doing something wrong....man, that blows. Ok, so, realistically, we can say that VFP apps should not be Active Docs and we all need to learn HTML, JavaScript, and VBScript (blech) to be effective on the web, eh?
>
>I wonder....is it any different with VB Active Documents?
>
>Thanks again, Rick.

We have been totally disappointed with VB ActiveDocs. They required too much work for what it was worth. We're going with DHTML and ADO. We might use some XML too, but we haven't decided about that yet.