>Hi!!
>Recently I have a discussion with a friend about using Stored procedures on the DBC vs using small objects to carry out some tasks...
>
>I think that if you have a small task or series of small tasks to acomplish a wraper class may be the best solution or even add or create a small object to carry out specific functions... an then remove it from memory...
>
>He said that his concern was the use of memory on that way, creating, adding and (or) removing objects, for him a best approach was to use stored procedures on the DBC... (more like ...!!@#$ Oracle @#!!$ kind of thing)
>
>Does anybody has any thoughts on this...??
>Thanks !

Stored procedures stay with the data and can be updated centrally in the DBC instead of (usually) on the client in a library. Also properly written stored procedures (subset of the language) can be executed by the VFP ODBC driver.