>Actually, I'm just paraphrasing my advanced calaculus book. They say that C is not ordered, and there are several ways to show this (but they don't explain further). But all ordered number fields must obey 4 properties of inequalities, as I said:
That's true only if we consider the field C. I was talking about an order on the set C. In this case, there are only 3 inequalities (axioms): reflexivity, tranzitivity and antisymmetry.
>>Which means 0 <= i. How is this?
0+0*i <= 0+1*i
>>I never said that C and R are isomorphic. I said RxR is isomorphic with C. (An element in RxR is an order pair: (x,y).)
>>
>I don't quite follow. What does C plane look like here?
If z is from C and z=a+b*i, then we associate to z the pair (a,b) from RxR. And this is one isomorphism between C and RxR. And this is why C is called sometimes: the plane of the complex numbers.
Vlad
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only