Information générale
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
>Hi Arnon,
>
>I understand what you are saying, but I do not understand how this approach gets me away from DO/ENDDO processing. It would seem to me that DO/ENDDO would still be required due to the variable-length nature of the linked list. Is there something I'm missing here?
You still need the DO..ENDDO or some other loop for implementing pushing the message - but what I suggested has less overhead than redimensioning the array as you go along etc.
You could implement a pullling mechanism - but how to do it and what cost it has (in resources etc.) depends on what you do
Arnon
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement