>You're too far beyond me for me to understand your analogy. :)

An attitude like that will keep you there. :-) I'm not "beyond" you, I just have more experience. :-)

Basically, what I was saying was that WebConnect, as I worked with it, allowed me to build the HTML without worrying too much about how I was going to get it to the server. It had just the level of abstraction I needed, plus some I didn't need: I wouldn't have used the "display a cursor as a table" routine, I would have hand-coded WebConnect to create the table as I wanted to see it.