>Using a error handler that was written several years ago for a 2.6 application. It interpretes many of the error codes and give an english like message, and then either bailsout or retries. Would like something to compare to my current error handler.
>
>Do most people try to interprete the error code and give an english message? As a programmer, rarely do I find this useful. I would rather the program, line of code, error number, error message, etc. Any thoughts on this?
>

Hi Brenda,

I was going to point you to Stonefield, but I see Craig already has.

As additional info, once at the website, look under "Technical Papers" for Error Handling in VFP. The heirarchical error handling method is a little complex and has a moderate learning curve, but it is extremely flexible and adaptable to just about any situation (imho).

Good luck,

regards,