Ah, ok. Thanks!

-Michelle


>It's official NASDAQ abbreviation for Microsoft, for years it's considered overvalued so your 'False Truths' allusion might be in place.
>
>>I'm sorry... I don't see what you're saying...
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>-Michelle
>>
>>
>>>It's Wall Street quote for the same thing :-)
>>>
>>>>Pardon my ignorance, but what is MSFT? The MS I can figure, but FT? From your post I think maybe False Truths...?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>-Michelle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Bill,
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Are applicants to pretend that FP/VFP never existed?? If an applicant were to say something like 'yea, I bought Bob and thought it was pretty cool, but I guess it was just a bit ahead of its time', would that person be told to shut up about it and be sure not to mention it????
>>>>>
>>>>>That's what was implied
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>When asked I am happy and proud to tell an interviewer that I can claim Autocoder, COBOL, Fortran, OS Assembler etc in addition to the more 'modern' languages. Frankly, I just wouldn't heed the advice given in this case, and if it meant not getting a job, then so be it. It is stupid advice, more indicative of a 'siege mentality' or an 'historical revisionism' bent and I doubt that I would want to work in such an environment.
>>>>>
>>>>>He wants the job -- he's not going to mention it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>If this attitude is truly prevalent around Microsoft in general, then they are in far deeper trouble than I ever would have guessed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Around the MSFT campus, I suspect a FoxPro/VFP would return shrugs -- I suspect most within MSFT don't even realize what FoxPro is. MSFT Consulting and the sales departments, however, it appears to be a different story.