Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Tech-ed Topic Summary; something missing?
Message
From
17/03/1999 11:51:10
 
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Conferences & events
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00193227
Message ID:
00198613
Views:
43
Hiya JimB ---

>No, what I am suggesting is that n-tier is not necessarily a more complex solution. Once the classes exist it really takes no more or less effort to make an app n-tier than 1 tier.
>
>I think that n-tier often gets a bad rap as being complex when it is not.

It probably depends on the a) scope of application and, b) skills of the developer. I'm not raining on n-tier, I firmly believe that an architecture should be as complicated as required for the application but never more so.

JVP in his response brought up interesting points that I find myself agreeing with insofar as complexity and scope issues.

As to "virtual n-tier" I think we all do it. That single-tier app I alluded to in an earlier post has business service classes, a quasi-data services class (handles queries and mass post operations but not basic I/U/D -- I have bound controls).
------------------------------------------------
John Koziol, ex-MVP, ex-MS, ex-FoxTeam. Just call me "X"
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter Thompson (Gonzo) RIP 2/19/05
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform