Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Programming archeology
Message
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00204262
Message ID:
00204668
Vues:
30
Joséééééééééééééé,

I never had to validate bank accounts, just had to generate new check digti number (airway bills) and they do use a check digit mod 7. For 2 digits, you're right the check digit is 97, I quoted from memory, and l'âge aidant, I should not.

I'm glad to hear about your friend. But it is scary no? Last week my boss asked me to find the telephone number of somebody in New York, I said, you're crazy, cannot be done. He said "Try". So I tried, after 30 secs I was back with the number, a map of where his block is situated and a list of his neighbours.

Then I thought, Jesus, that is scary! But then, it _is_ the US, they're all crazy out there, it'll a take a few years before they'll find me. ...

Then I tried "Grajower", found my address my telephone number and a map .... and the site that delivers these miracles is our good old InfoBel. :)

L'avenir ne manque pas de futur.

Marc

>>>Many years ago, more than I care to remember, I used to program accounting machines. One thing all our "programs" had was a check digit appended at the end of numeric codes so that it was easy to detect misstypings. I cannot remember how those check digits were calculated but it had to be very simple: only the most expensive machines could multiply or divide. Anybody knows how the check digit was calculated?
>>
>>> I am taking a few days off, the first in several months, and I know that not having the answer risks spoiling the fun.
>>
>>That we dooooo not want.
>>
>>for 1 digit they take mod(x,7) where x is the number without check digit. For a 2 digit check they would take mod(x,93).
>>
>>They may not have been able to multiply or devide, but they could 'shift' 'push' and 'pop' like nobody can today if my memory is correct :)
>>
>>Marc
>
>Hi Marc,
>
>Belgian bank accounts have the following format, (as you may know...) 340-0551143-27 (the next one would be 340-0551144-28)
>
>Here is the valid from my cBankTextBox.
>
>
>*---------------------- Location Section ----------------------
>*  Library...........: common30\ccustctl.vcx
>*  Class.............: Cbanquetextbox
>*  Method............: Valid()
>*-------------------------- Copyright -------------------------
>*  Author............: José Constant
>*  Project...........: Prosal
>*  Created...........: 11/07/96  15:01:56
>*  Copyright.........: (c) Terre-Engineering S.A.             , 1996
>*----------------------- Usage Section ------------------------
>
>LOCAL lAg,  ;
>      lCp,  ;
>      lMod, ;
>      lAgcp
>
>lAg = SUBSTR(this.value,1,3)
>lCp = SUBSTR(this.value,4,7)
>lMod = SUBSTR(this.value,11,2)
>lAgCp = lAg + lCp
>
>IF this.Value = "000000000000";
> .OR. this.Value = "903000900379";
> .OR. lCp = "0000000"
>  this.value = ""
>  this.Refresh()
>ELSE
>	IF VAL(lAgcp) = 0 .AND. VAL(lMod) =97
>	  RETURN .T.
>	ELSE
>	  IF MOD(VAL(lAgcp),97)=0 .AND. VAL(lMod) = 97
>	    RETURN .T.
>	  ELSE
>	    IF MOD(VAL(lAgcp),97) <> VAL(lMOD)
>	      =ErrorMsg(ILLEGALVALUE_LOC)
>	      RETURN .F.
>      ELSE
>	      RETURN .T.
>	    ENDIF
>	  ENDIF
>	ENDIF
>ENDIF
>
>RETURN
>
>
>
>
>By the way, Marc, I found back the guy I was researching by checking the phone guides on the Web. He was second on the list I tried!
>
>José

If things have the tendency to go your way, do not worry. It won't last. Jules Renard.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform