>>>And views can only live in dbcs. They are not files, their definition lives as a record in the dbc. NO dbc, no view.
>>----
>>Thanks Eric... I wanted to try and get away from DBCs, but I guess not.
>>I thought free tables would be less cumbersome...
>
>Why? What's the matter with a dbc? Gives you a lot more freedom as far as field properties and stuff. Don't be afraid of dbcs...
>
>
>>app and I wanted to use free tables with it...I am not sure how to do
>>buffering with free tables for a network app.
>
>Buffering for free tables is exactly the same as buffering for contained tables.
>
>A table being contained in a database and buffering are really two entirely different things.
--------
Thanks Eric...
I think you are right about dbcs and I guess I should use them for all or most my programs.... thanks again..:)