>>
>>WOW! Hey, Glen. Its good to see someone else is at least in here. I was begining to think I was alone. Well, if you have any questions or find any cool stuff drop it in here so we can get this thing going.
>
>From a C learning book:
>
>If one considers Kernighan and Ritchie (1978) appendix A to be the standard for C, then some extensions must be considered 'non-standard'..
>Some of the current implementations of functions returning structures are not re-entrant, and can produce bugs when a function is called several times in one expression.
>
>Do you think this applys to Visual C++ ? If so, what functions ? If not..Why ?
As much as i hate to sing the microsoft song. I use the MFC as the standard. And once I have created a class or subclass, then I tend to use that one. And re-entrance hss not been a problem even in the non standard ones. This is probably due to the internal stucture of windows framework.
:)
~Joe Johnston USA
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animated contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsel or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
~Samuel Adams
