>Hi,
>
>I think the problem should be the speed of your PC.
>It happened to my customer PC too with speed of 333Mhz onwards.
>The
www.abri.com do offer patch for this problem. However, microsoft
>had just release a patch of this problem too, but it is mean for
>Foxpro 2.6a only as stated in the readme file.
>
I think that's what I said - the processor speed is an obvious issue, and I've seen inconsistent problems at 333MHz - again, it depends on the
specific processor and memory arrangement, since there are a wide range of CPUs that have a nominal internal CPU clock of 333MHz - at a minimum, there are Celeron, Pentium II, AMD K6 and Cyrix M2 processor with an internal clock speed of 333MHz and in spite of the fact that they have the same nominal internal clock speed, they do not perform the same, and don't interface to system memory at the same speed. From what I've seen, everything with a nominal speed of 350MHz does have the problem, and all the processors I'm aware of that operate at that speed have an external clock frequency >66MHz except for the Celeron (all Celerons use an external memory clock of 66MHz unless you've played around with overclocking the processor, in which case, you created your own problems...)
>
>
>>>I'm running an app compiled in Fox 2.6 for Windows. When we try to run it in a computer just set up with Win 95 and another with Win 98, we get the message "An error has occurred in your program. To keep working anyway, click Ignore and save your work in a new file..."
>>>
>>
>>Is it possible you're seeing a machine speed related problem with the new box? You might want to try one of the speed fixes at
www.abri.com, especially if the new machines are running a processor with a 100MHz FSB clock (PII&PIII at 350MHz and above, or the newer K6/3s; the problems are not limited to the 100MHz FSB CPUs, but they do occur consistently with these processors.)
>>
>>>When we click "Ignore" the app seems to run OK. All of our other Win 95 PCs run it OK. I believe all the appropriate .esl's, .dll's, etc. are loaded.
>>>
>>>Any sugestions? Is it possible that this is a problem with later patches of Win 95 and Win 98?
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>Bob A.
